Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matilde Paoletti vs Evialina Laskevich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paoletti vs Laskevich analysis and find out who is favored!
Matilde Paoletti vs Evialina Laskevich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paoletti 0 - 0 Laskevich
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paoletti has won 30.23% of points on his second serve, while Laskevich has won 52.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paoletti, in recent form, has won 52.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Laskevich has won 60.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.56% and 44.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paoletti has saved 37.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Laskevich has saved 54.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paoletti has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 5/ 3), with Laskevich winning 69.23% (W/L 36/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paoletti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 40/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Laskevich has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 35/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Paoletti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 5/ 3), where as Laskevich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paoletti has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.75 while Laskevich has played against players with an average rank of 229.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paoletti has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Laskevich has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paoletti has converted 43.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Laskevich has converted 49.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
672
Rank
262
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
452
Rank
429
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
56% (43-34)
Career Total W/L
68% (84-40)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
81% (25-6)
$5,265
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matilde Paoletti | Evialina Laskevich |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 81% (25/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 76% (53/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (61/61) | 62% (377/233) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 81% (25/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:36 | 1:42:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 300.2 | 228 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (183/269) | 68% (1297/1898) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (99/183) | 63% (814/1297) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 30% (26/86) | 52% (314/602) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (19/44) | 50% (164/329) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (139/301) | 51% (1053/2066) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 79% (15/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (10/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 81% (25/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 95% (22/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 5% (22/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 44% (9/4) |
Matilde Paoletti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Matilde Paoletti
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Matilde Paoletti
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
77 of
103)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Selena Janicijevic
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Anca Alexia Todoni
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
38%
(
10 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
67%
(
29 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
43
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 0-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jennifer Ruggeri
Player
Matilde Paoletti
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
85%
(
35 of
41)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Deborah Chiesa
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Matilde Paoletti
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evialina Laskevich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Evialina Laskevich
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Alexandra Shubladze
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Lina Glushko
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Daria Kudashova
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
81 of
135)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
48%
(
52 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
68 of
135)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Tereza Valentova
71%
(
76 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
26%
(
8 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Elena Pridankina
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Aruzhan Sagandikova
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yufei Ren
Player
Evialina Laskevich
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Xiaodi You
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
85)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paoletti Vs Laskevich Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
